lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9868bd4-6f14-4628-88ea-56d06027739e@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2023 17:59:08 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>, nick@...anahar.org,
        dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: input: atmel,maxtouch: add
 poweroff-in-suspend property

On 07/12/2023 12:12, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/atmel,maxtouch.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/atmel,maxtouch.yaml
> index c40799355ed7..047a5101341c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/atmel,maxtouch.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/atmel,maxtouch.yaml
> @@ -87,6 +87,12 @@ properties:
>        - 2 # ATMEL_MXT_WAKEUP_GPIO
>      default: 0
>  
> +  atmel,poweroff-in-suspend:
> +    description: |
> +      When this property is set, all supplies are turned off when the system is
> +      going to suspend.

You described the desired Linux feature or behavior, not the actual
hardware. The bindings are about the latter, so instead you need to
rephrase the property and its description to match actual hardware
capabilities/features/configuration etc.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ