lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2023 09:34:09 +0800
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To:     Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc:     agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com,
        dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, janpieter.sollie@...net.be,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
        "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] md: split MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED out of mddev_resume

Hi,

在 2023/12/07 1:24, Song Liu 写道:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:36 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2023/12/06 16:30, Song Liu 写道:
>>> On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 7:18 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>>>
>>>> New mddev_resume() calls are added to synchroniza IO with array
>>>> reconfiguration, however, this introduce a regression while adding it in
>>>> md_start_sync():
>>>>
>>>> 1) someone set MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED first;
>>>> 2) daemon thread grab reconfig_mutex, then clear MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED and
>>>>      queue a new sync work;
>>>> 3) daemon thread release reconfig_mutex;
>>>> 4) in md_start_sync
>>>>      a) check that there are spares that can be added/removed, then suspend
>>>>         the array;
>>>>      b) remove_and_add_spares may not be called, or called without really
>>>>         add/remove spares;
>>>>      c) resume the array, then set MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED again!
>>>>
>>>> Loop between 2 - 4, then mddev_suspend() will be called quite often, for
>>>> consequence, normal IO will be quite slow.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this problem by spliting MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED out of mddev_resume(), so
>>>> that md_start_sync() won't set such flag and hence the loop will be broken.
>>>
>>> I hope we don't leak set_bit MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED to all call
>>> sites of mddev_resume().
>>
>> There are also some other mddev_resume() that is added later and don't
>> need recovery, so md_start_sync() is not the only place:
>>
>>    - md_setup_drive
>>    - rdev_attr_store
>>    - suspend_lo_store
>>    - suspend_hi_store
>>    - autorun_devices
>>    - md_ioct
>>    - r5c_disable_writeback_async
>>    - error path from new_dev_store(), ...
>>
>> I'm not sure add a new helper is a good idea, because all above apis
>> should use new helper as well.
> 
> I think for most of these call sites, it is OK to set MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED
> (although it is not needed), and md_start_sync() is the only one that may
> trigger "loop between 2 - 4" scenario. Did I miss something?

Yes, it's the only problematic one. I'll send v2.

Thanks,
Kuai

> 
> It is already rc4, so we need to send the fix soon.
> 
> Thanks,
> Song
> .
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ