linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/26] selftests/resctrl: Split measure_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bf59d8f2-7977-4dc6-afca-9c80e06ee549@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2023 10:35:25 -0800
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>,
        Maciej Wieczór-Retman 
        <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/26] selftests/resctrl: Split measure_cache_vals()



On 12/7/2023 10:33 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> 
> I already spent some moments in converting all return error -> return -1, 
> since all such places do perror() calls anyway (which I also converted to 
> ksft_perror() or ksft_print_msg() where perror() didn't make any sense) 
> there's not much added value in returning the errno which was not 
> correctly done in the existing code anyway.

Thank you very much Ilpo.

Reinette