[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231207-avancieren-unbezahlbar-9258f45ec3ec@brauner>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:25:09 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Tycho Andersen <tandersen@...flix.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] pidfd: allow pidfd_open() on non-thread-group leaders
> If these concerns are correct
So, ok. I misremebered this. The scenario I had been thinking of is
basically the following.
We have a thread-group with thread-group leader 1234 and a thread with
4567 in that thread-group. Assume current thread-group leader is tsk1
and the non-thread-group leader is tsk2. tsk1 uses struct pid *tg_pid
and tsk2 uses struct pid *t_pid. The struct pids look like this after
creation of both thread-group leader tsk1 and thread tsk2:
TGID 1234 TID 4567
tg_pid[PIDTYPE_PID] = tsk1 t_pid[PIDTYPE_PID] = tsk2
tg_pid[PIDTYPE_TGID] = tsk1 t_pid[PIDTYPE_TGID] = NULL
IOW, tsk2's struct pid has never been used as a thread-group leader and
thus PIDTYPE_TGID is NULL. Now assume someone does create pidfds for
tsk1 and for tsk2:
tg_pidfd = pidfd_open(tsk1) t_pidfd = pidfd_open(tsk2)
-> tg_pidfd->private_data = tg_pid -> t_pidfd->private_data = t_pid
So we stash away struct pid *tg_pid for a pidfd_open() on tsk1 and we
stash away struct pid *t_pid for a pidfd_open() on tsk2.
If we wait on that task via P_PIDFD we get:
/* waiting through pidfd */
waitid(P_PIDFD, tg_pidfd) waitid(P_PIDFD, t_pidfd)
tg_pid[PIDTYPE_TGID] == tsk1 t_pid[PIDTYPE_TGID] == NULL
=> succeeds => fails
Because struct pid *tg_pid is used a thread-group leader struct pid we
can wait on that tsk1. But we can't via the non-thread-group leader
pidfd because the struct pid *t_pid has never been used as a
thread-group leader.
Now assume, t_pid exec's and the struct pids are transfered. IIRC, we
get:
tg_pid[PIDTYPE_PID] = tsk2 t_pid[PIDTYPE_PID] = tsk1
tg_pid[PIDTYPE_TGID] = tsk2 t_pid[PIDTYPE_TGID] = NULL
If we wait on that task via P_PIDFD we get:
/* waiting through pidfd */
waitid(P_PIDFD, tg_pidfd) waitid(P_PIDFD, t_pid)
tg_pid[PIDTYPE_TGID] == tsk2 t_pid[PIDTYPE_TGID] == NULL
=> succeeds => fails
Which is what we want. So effectively this should all work and I
misremembered the struct pid linkage. So afaict we don't even have a
problem here which is great.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists