linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] mfd: twl4030-power: accept standard property for power controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 00:13:32 +0100
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, bcousson@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] mfd: twl4030-power: accept standard property for
 power controller

On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 17:13:41 +0000
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 03 Dec 2023, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> 
> > Instead of only accepting the ti specific properties accept also
> > the standard property. For uniformity, search in the parent node  
> 
> Search 'in' the parent node or 'from' the parent node?
> 
> Where is the property?
> 
The idea was to have the device tree property at the same place for all
twl family devices. So no distinction for these devices needed
in the bindings. It is in the main node.

I guess today this twl4030-power subnode would not be accepted nowadays
and the compatible would be some kind of flag in the parent.

> > for the tag. The code for powering of is also isolated from the  
> 
> Should this be "off"?
> 
yes, of course.

Regards,
Andreas