[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgJUgVGpQJ=KgH+3RzAJ8Ce50Acr=gSZh_ZLuiTa3-sEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:26:43 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org, svens@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Fix fails of perf stat --bpf-counters
--for-each-cgroup on s390
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 4:57 AM Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On s390 this test fails very often, as can be observed in the output
> below. This is caused by the second test function
> check_cpu_list_counted(). The perf stat is triggered for 2 CPUs
> 0 and 1. On s390, which usually has a lot more CPUs, most often
> this ends up in no counter increments on these 2 CPUs 0 and 1.
>
> Fix this and trigger explicit workload on CPU 0 and 1 for
> systemd. This is a better approach than calculating a long
> list of CPUs (which is basicly the same as option -a), or
> wait a longer period of time.
>
> Output before:
> # for i in $(seq 10)
> > do ./perf test 100
> > done
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : FAILED!
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : FAILED!
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : FAILED!
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : FAILED!
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> #
>
> Output after:
> # for i in $(seq 10);
> do ./perf test 100;
> done
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> 100: perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test : Ok
> #
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh
> index e75d0780dc78..f67602321403 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ check_system_wide_counted()
>
> check_cpu_list_counted()
> {
> + taskset -c 0,1 systemctl daemon-reexec &
Thanks for the patch. But I think it should support
machines without systemd (or maybe with old versions).
Also probably you want to reset the behavior after
the test. I think we can just run some built-in test
workload like `perf test -w thloop`.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> check_cpu_list_counted_output=$(perf stat -C 0,1 --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup ${test_cgroups} -e cpu-clock -x, taskset -c 1 sleep 1 2>&1)
> if echo ${check_cpu_list_counted_output} | grep -q -F "<not "; then
> echo "Some CPU events are not counted"
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists