lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231207031513.GX1674809@ZenIV>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2023 03:15:13 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-cachefs@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
        gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] hash-bl: explicitly initialise hash-bl heads

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 05:05:38PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> 
> Because we are going to change how the structure is laid out to
> support RTPREEMPT and LOCKDEP, just assuming that the hash table is
> allocated as zeroed memory is no longer sufficient to initialise
> a hash-bl table.

static inline void init_bl_hash(struct hlist_bl *table, int shift)?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ