[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231207031513.GX1674809@ZenIV>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 03:15:13 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] hash-bl: explicitly initialise hash-bl heads
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 05:05:38PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
>
> Because we are going to change how the structure is laid out to
> support RTPREEMPT and LOCKDEP, just assuming that the hash table is
> allocated as zeroed memory is no longer sufficient to initialise
> a hash-bl table.
static inline void init_bl_hash(struct hlist_bl *table, int shift)?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists