[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZtt8xedBJyRns+6HpdXoBxadLUGuGNG5s1trEbRgb9hA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 20:51:46 -0800
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-cgroup] cgroup: Move rcu_head up near the top of cgroup_root
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 8:38 PM Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Commit d23b5c577715 ("cgroup: Make operations on the cgroup root_list RCU
> safe") adds a new rcu_head to the cgroup_root structure and kvfree_rcu()
> for freeing the cgroup_root.
>
> The use of kvfree_rcu(), however, has the limitation that the offset of
> the rcu_head structure within the larger data structure cannot exceed
> 4096 or the compilation will fail. By putting rcu_head below the cgroup
> structure, any change to the cgroup structure that makes it larger has
> the risk of build failure. Commit 77070eeb8821 ("cgroup: Avoid false
> cacheline sharing of read mostly rstat_cpu") happens to be the commit
> that breaks it even though it is not its fault. Fix it by moving the
> rcu_head structure up before the cgroup structure.
>
> Fixes: d23b5c577715 ("cgroup: Make operations on the cgroup root_list RCU safe")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/cgroup-defs.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h b/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
> index 5a97ea95b564..45359969d8cf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
> @@ -562,6 +562,10 @@ struct cgroup_root {
> /* Unique id for this hierarchy. */
> int hierarchy_id;
>
> + /* A list running through the active hierarchies */
> + struct list_head root_list;
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> +
Perhaps the comment should mention the placement requirements, and
maybe a pointer to wherever it is specified that the offset of struct
rcu_head should not exceed 4096?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists