[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1905b2b7-629d-4f80-1b77-0479596ba17d@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 08:39:15 +0100
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: <justinstitt@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Shay Agroskin <shayagr@...zon.com>,
Arthur Kiyanovski <akiyano@...zon.com>,
David Arinzon <darinzon@...zon.com>,
Noam Dagan <ndagan@...zon.com>,
Saeed Bishara <saeedb@...zon.com>,
Rasesh Mody <rmody@...vell.com>,
Sudarsana Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>,
<GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com>,
Dimitris Michailidis <dmichail@...gible.com>,
Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>,
"Shannon Nelson" <shannon.nelson@....com>,
Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@....com>, <drivers@...sando.io>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Ronak Doshi <doshir@...are.com>,
"VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers" <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
"Joe Perches" <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
"Lukas Bulwahn" <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <olteanv@...il.com>,
Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>,
Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
"Steen Hegelund" <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>,
Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC: <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
<oss-drivers@...igine.com>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] checkpatch: add
ethtool_sprintf rules
On 12/7/23 00:16, justinstitt@...gle.com wrote:
> Add some warnings for using ethtool_sprintf() where a simple
> ethtool_puts() would suffice.
>
> The two cases are:
>
> 1) Use ethtool_sprintf() with just two arguments:
> | ethtool_sprintf(&data, driver[i].name);
> or
> 2) Use ethtool_sprintf() with a standalone "%s" fmt string:
> | ethtool_sprintf(&data, "%s", driver[i].name);
>
> The former may cause -Wformat-security warnings while the latter is just
> not preferred. Both are safely in the category of warnings, not errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 25fdb7fda112..6924731110d8 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -7011,6 +7011,25 @@ sub process {
> "Prefer strscpy, strscpy_pad, or __nonstring over strncpy - see: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90\n" . $herecurr);
> }
>
> +# ethtool_sprintf uses that should likely be ethtool_puts
> + if ($line =~ /\bethtool_sprintf\s*\(\s*$FuncArg\s*,\s*$FuncArg\s*\)/) {
> + if (WARN("PREFER_ETHTOOL_PUTS",
> + "Prefer ethtool_puts over ethtool_sprintf with only two arguments\n" . $herecurr) &&
> + $fix) {
> + $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\bethtool_sprintf\s*\(\s*($FuncArg)\s*,\s*($FuncArg)/ethtool_puts($1, $7)/;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + # use $rawline because $line loses %s via sanitization and thus we can't match against it.
> + if ($rawline =~ /\bethtool_sprintf\s*\(\s*$FuncArg\s*,\s*\"\%s\"\s*,\s*$FuncArg\s*\)/) {
> + if (WARN("PREFER_ETHTOOL_PUTS",
> + "Prefer ethtool_puts over ethtool_sprintf with standalone \"%s\" specifier\n" . $herecurr) &&
> + $fix) {
> + $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\bethtool_sprintf\s*\(\s*($FuncArg)\s*,\s*"\%s"\s*,\s*($FuncArg)/ethtool_puts($1, $7)/;
(not related to the patch)
without deeper digging it was completely unclear why it is $7 for the
"second" capture group, turns out that FuncArg contains parens and other
vars with parens :~
> + }
> + }
> +
> +
> # typecasts on min/max could be min_t/max_t
> if ($perl_version_ok &&
> defined $stat &&
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists