[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC=S1nibsNfo7Ans2J0aiXqJSz5-iTPh2NwTEuUL8-HUM0AJdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 19:14:31 +0800
From: Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>, Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] media: mediatek: vcodec: Drop unnecessary variable
Hi Angelo,
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 6:19 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 13/11/23 13:26, Fei Shao ha scritto:
> > It's unclear why only mem->size has local copies without particular
> > usage in mtk_vcodec_mem_alloc() and mtk_vcodec_mem_free(), and they
> > seem removable.
> >
> > Drop them to make the code visually consistent, and update printk format
> > identifier accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>
>
> That's probably just about personal preferences, as mem->size is not expected
> to change during the flow of those functions.
>
> That said, as much as you, I prefer not having this local copy as it's using
> (a very small amount of) memory for no real reason anyway, so:
Yes, and I think I should have mentioned this in the commit message...
I'll revise that in the next version.
Thanks,
Fei
>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists