[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878r668b6s.fsf@somnus>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2023 13:11:07 +0100
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/32] timers: Move from a push remote at enqueue to
a pull at expiry model
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de> writes:
> Hi,
>
> the queue grew because of some additional cleanup patches and splitting
> already existing patches to make review easier. Several minor things had to
> be reworked. For all people who did testing, I would be really happy if you
> could test v9 as well!
bigeasy triggered a warning during boot. So I'll go and fix it and will
send a v10 when I'm done.
Thanks,
Anna-Maria
Powered by blists - more mailing lists