[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231207141723.108004-2-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:16:30 +0100
From: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Amarula patchwork <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>,
michael@...rulasolutions.com,
Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/10] drm/bridge: Fix bridge disable logic
As explained by the comment of the fixed code, we need to find the next
bridge that hasn't set the "pre_enable_prev_first" flag to true. The code,
on the contrary, was doing the opposite.
So, the order of disabling the bridges couldn't be altered as required
by setting the "pre_enable_prev_first" flag to true.
Fixes: 4fb912e5e190 ("drm/bridge: Introduce pre_enable_prev_first to alter bridge init order")
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
---
(no changes since v1)
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
index 30d66bee0ec6..f66bf4925dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ void drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
*/
list_for_each_entry_from(next, &encoder->bridge_chain,
chain_node) {
- if (next->pre_enable_prev_first) {
+ if (!next->pre_enable_prev_first) {
next = list_prev_entry(next, chain_node);
limit = next;
break;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists