linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] of: reserved_mem: fix error log for reserved mem init failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOuPNLhVHHGa45rGvXrcYaDvxvWk7H7Ckip=jiM38ppKw_7uvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 21:24:08 +0530
From:   Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@...il.com>
To:     Pintu Kumar <quic_pintu@...cinc.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: reserved_mem: fix error log for reserved mem init failure

On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 20:45, Pintu Kumar <quic_pintu@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> During fdt_init_reserved_mem() when __reserved_mem_init_node()
> fail we are using pr_info to print error.
>
> So, if we change the loglevel to 4 (or below), this error
> message will be missed.
>
> Thus, change the pr_info to pr_err for fail case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pintu Kumar <quic_pintu@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> index 7ec94cfcbddb..473665e76b6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ void __init fdt_init_reserved_mem(void)
>                 if (err == 0) {
>                         err = __reserved_mem_init_node(rmem);
>                         if (err != 0 && err != -ENOENT) {
> -                               pr_info("node %s compatible matching fail\n",
> +                               pr_err("node %s compatible matching fail\n",
>                                         rmem->name);
>                                 if (nomap)
>                                         memblock_clear_nomap(rmem->base, rmem->size);
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Looks like the patch got pushed twice because of some network issue.
Please consider this one for review.

Thanks