[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkgDwnC_jaGjXjk9yKYo=zWDR_3x7Drw3i=KX0Wyij6ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:08:47 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: comex <comexk@...il.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] rust: file: add `Kuid` wrapper
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 8:19 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 6:28 AM comex <comexk@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Regarding the issue of wrappers not being inlined, it's possible to get LLVM to optimize C and Rust code together into an object file, with the help of a compatible Clang and LLD:
> >
> > @ rustc -O --emit llvm-bc a.rs
> > @ clang --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -O2 -c -emit-llvm -o b.bc b.c
> > @ ld.lld -r -o c.o a.bc b.bc
> >
> > Basically LTO but within the scope of a single object file. This would be redundant in cases where kernel-wide LTO is enabled.
> >
> > Using this approach might slow down compilation a bit due to needing to pass the LLVM bitcode between multiple commands, but probably not very much.
> >
> > Just chiming in as someone not involved in Rust for Linux but familiar with these tools. Perhaps this has been considered before and rejected for some reason; I wouldn’t know.
>
> Thanks comex for chiming in, much appreciated.
>
> Yeah, this is what we have been calling the "local-LTO hack" and it
> was one of the possibilities we were considering for non-LTO kernel
> builds for performance reasons originally. I don't recall who
> originally suggested it in one of our meetings (Gary or Björn
> perhaps).
>
> If LLVM folks think LLVM-wise nothing will break, then we are happy to
On paper, nothing comes to mind. No promises though.
>From a build system perspective, I'd rather just point users towards
LTO if they have this concern. We support full and thin lto. This
proposal would add a third variant for just rust drivers. Each
variation on LTO has a maintenance cost and each have had their own
distinct fun bugs in the past. Not sure an additional variant is
worth the maintenance cost, even if it's technically feasible.
> go ahead with that (since it also solves the performance side), but it
> would be nice to know if it will always be OK to build like that, i.e.
> I think Andreas actually tried it and it seemed to work and boot, but
> the worry is whether there is something subtle that could have bad
> codegen in the future.
>
> (We will also need to worry about GCC.)
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists