[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231208184753.6a88801b@aktux>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 18:47:53 +0100
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, marcel@...tmann.org,
johan.hedberg@...il.com, luiz.dentz@...il.com, johan@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com,
Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] bluetooth/gnss: GNSS support for TiWi chips
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 08:39:21 -0600
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 2:51 PM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:54:24 +0200
> > Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > > - Output at /dev/gnssX:
> > > > AI2 vs. NMEA
> > > > The chip can be configured into sending AI2-encapsulated NMEA,
> > > > or proving data in a binary format.
> > > > Some research has to be done yet for the details.
> > > > A pile of logs is waiting for further analysis...
> > > >
> > > > Arguments for/against NMEA:
> > > > + Userspace is prepared to handle it
> > > > + Power management can be easily done by the kernel
> > > > - Less functionality can be used.
> > >
> > > I'd go with NMEA format as the default setting :)
> > >
> > yes, that would also be my preference.
> >
> > > > Arguments for/against AI2:
> > > > + Full functionality can be accessed from userspace (incl. A-GPS,
> > > > maybe raw satellite data)
> > > > - Userspace has to behave to have proper power management
> > > > - No freely (not even as in beer) tool available to fully use AI2,
> > > > so there will be only a real advantage after long "French Cafe"
> > > > sessions.
> > >
> > > Seems AI2 could be optionally enabled as needed with some writes
> > > to /dev/gnss0 to change the mode?
> >
> > Hmm, we have
> > /sys/class/gnss/gnss0/type to get the mode, maybe we add some file
> > to change the mode? Or having it hidden behing a module parameter
> > and implement something better accessible if any need arrives?
> >
> > If we want NMEA output, probably some init commands will be sent at
> > open(), but userspace doing something with AI2 probably does not want
> > the device touched, so it should probably be already be set before open().
>
> Is there another revision coming or should I try to test this one? I
> am not very familiar with the GNSS part of the module, but it sounds
> like there was some consensus as to which direction we should go. I
> should have a little time this weekend.
>
Progress is only in my test program. No more checksum errors, I have
made some progress in protocol reverse engineering. So make sure
you do a git pull for https://github.com/akemnade/bt200tools
Regards,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists