[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB5896A7AFDE1DC8D1C7AD65FCC38AA@SJ0PR11MB5896.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 19:20:03 +0000
From: "Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak)" <kartilak@...co.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "Sesidhar Baddela (sebaddel)" <sebaddel@...co.com>,
"Arulprabhu Ponnusamy (arulponn)" <arulponn@...co.com>,
"Dhanraj Jhawar (djhawar)" <djhawar@...co.com>,
"Gian Carlo Boffa (gcboffa)" <gcboffa@...co.com>,
"Masa Kai (mkai2)" <mkai2@...co.com>,
"Satish Kharat (satishkh)" <satishkh@...co.com>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 00/13] Introduce support for multiqueue (MQ) in fnic
On Friday, December 8, 2023 10:04 AM, Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Karan!
>
> >> This series doesn't apply to 6.8/scsi-queue.
> >
> > Okay. Thanks Martin.
> > Please advise how I can proceed with getting the patch set accepted.
>
> I tried v5 and it fails the same way as v4. First failure is patch #9, several additional conflicts after that.
>
> You need to submit a patch series that has been rebased on top of my 6.8/scsi-queue branch. I don't know what you used as baseline for the series in your git tree but it is not a suitable ancestor of my tree.
>
> Your changelog modification is fine. Thanks!
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
>
Thanks for this crucial piece of information, Martin.
I'll rebase the changes on top of the mentioned branch and re-submit the patch set.
Regards,
Karan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists