linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: restrict single port subnodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231208202436.GA2627018-robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 14:24:36 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
        Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
        Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>,
        coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: restrict single port
 subnodes

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:53:30PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> "in-ports" and "out-ports" with single "port" subnode should use
> "additionalProperties: false" to disallow any other properties mentioned
> by graph schema which are not applicable for this case, e.g.
> "address-cells".

The graph schema should already check this case with this subschema:

    oneOf:
      - required:
          - port
      - required:
          - "#address-cells"
          - "#size-cells"

However, I now see this would allow port and #address-cells if 
#size-cells is omitted. (#address-cells is a dependency for 
##size-cells, but not vice-versa because interrupt-controllers can have 
##just #address-cells). Perhaps this should instead be:

    oneOf:
      - required:
          - port
      - anyOf:
	  - required:
              - "#address-cells"
	  - required:
              - "#size-cells"

We're missing a similar check on endpoint. Or I'm forgetting why I 
didn't add it.

I suspect there are a lot more cases if we fixed these in the users.

Rob