[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0dc32ea-3b77-1e9e-42fd-3f115c001f7c@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 14:54:14 -0600
From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com,
ardb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com,
vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com,
jarkko@...nel.org, nikunj.dadhania@....com, pankaj.gupta@....com,
liam.merwick@...cle.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 16/50] x86/sev: Introduce snp leaked pages list
On 12/6/2023 2:42 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:27:45AM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
>> + spin_lock(&snp_leaked_pages_list_lock);
>> + while (npages--) {
>> + /*
>> + * Reuse the page's buddy list for chaining into the leaked
>> + * pages list. This page should not be on a free list currently
>> + * and is also unsafe to be added to a free list.
>> + */
>> + list_add_tail(&page->buddy_list, &snp_leaked_pages_list);
>> + sev_dump_rmpentry(pfn);
>> + pfn++;
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock(&snp_leaked_pages_list_lock);
>> + atomic_long_inc(&snp_nr_leaked_pages);
>
> How is this supposed to count?
>
> You're leaking @npages as the function's parameter but are incrementing
> snp_nr_leaked_pages only once?
>
> Just make it a bog-normal unsigned long and increment it inside the
> locked section.
>
> Or do at the beginning of the function:
>
> atomic_long_add(npages, &snp_nr_leaked_pages);
>
Yes will fix accordingly by incrementing it inside the locked section.
Thanks,
Ashish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists