lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fee5580-37ad-4c0a-b1d2-f45b592f86a4@wanadoo.fr>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 22:14:35 +0100
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>,
        VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VMCI: Remove handle_arr_calc_size()

Le 08/12/2023 à 21:59, Kees Cook a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 09:46:09PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> Use struct_size() instead of handle_arr_calc_size().
>> This is much more conventionnal.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> 
> Looks good. And since capacity in u32, there's no need for size_add().

Hmm,

isn't u32 + u32 --> u32, so can overflow?
If I understand correctly, the type promotion to size_t will occur after 
the addition.

So size_add() looks needed, or I missed something?

CJ

> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ