[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231208215537.GDZXOQ2TKjOZJlflUz@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 22:55:37 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86: Document what /proc/cpuinfo is for
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:20:31AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > +And even if it doesn't show a particular feature flag - although the CPU
> > +still does have support for the respective hardware functionality and
> > +said CPU supports CPUID faulting - userspace can simply probe for the
> > +feature and figure out if it is supported or not, regardless of whether
> > +it is being advertized somewhere.
>
> ^ advertised
"In a rare show of solidarity, both British English and American English
spell advertise with an s in all forms."
LOL: https://grammarist.com/spelling/advertise-vs-advertize/
Agreed with the rest, v2 coming up.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists