lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afec7eaa-9ef5-447f-9619-9721937fe805@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 12:58:38 +0530
From:   "Anwar, Md Danish" <a0501179@...com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
CC:     Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, <srk@...com>,
        <r-gunasekaran@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm: add overlay for icssg1
 2nd port

On 12/8/2023 3:10 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +	mdio-mux-2 {
>> +		compatible = "mdio-mux-multiplexer";
>> +		mux-controls = <&mdio_mux>;
>> +		mdio-parent-bus = <&icssg1_mdio>;
>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
>> +		#size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +		mdio@0 {
>> +			reg = <0x0>;
>> +			#address-cells = <1>;
>> +			#size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +			icssg1_phy2: ethernet-phy@3 {
>> +				reg = <3>;
>> +				tx-internal-delay-ps = <250>;
>> +				rx-internal-delay-ps = <2000>;
>> +			};
>> +		};
> 
> That looks odd. A mux generally has > 1 mdio bus. Otherwise its not
> really a mux.
> 

We are disabling node `mdio-mux-1` which has the `cpsw3g_mdio` bus and
then adding a new node `mdio-mux-2` which has the `icssg1_mdio` bus. The
mux can actually have two different mdio buses. The patch actually
disables the mux1 node and creates a new node for icssg1_mdio bus so
that cpsw3g mdio bus is disabled properly.

We can modify the existing `mdio-mux-1` as well (added the code below)
instead of disabling mux1 and creating mux2 node.

&mdio_mux_1 {
	mdio-parent-bus = <&icssg1_mdio>;
	#address-cells = <1>;
	#size-cells = <0>;

	mdio@0 {
		reg = <0x0>;
		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <0>;

		icssg1_phy2: ethernet-phy@3 {
			reg = <3>;
			tx-internal-delay-ps = <250>;
			rx-internal-delay-ps = <2000>;
		};
	};
};

Let me know what do you think. Is the approach in the patch correct or
should I modify existing mux node only?

> And this mux hardware exists all the time right? So it should be in
> the .dtsi file.
> 

Agreed. But the mdio-mux-1 node was added in k3-am642-evm.dts by the
commit 985204ecae1c37d55372874ff9146231d28fccc6. I did the same with
mdio-mux-2 node.

> 	Andrew

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Md Danish Anwar

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ