[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2TyvgVxGiHf9tLVgLAuw9h9gjv5iM0f_5KE0bM4PGIWrnNXRASVZ-UwxnI4v1XQEIp6mkbTTg9Sr7jEigChMd5Sxhpnd2NV8IDJ9sDXgIPo=@proton.me>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 09:30:41 +0000
From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: sync: add `CondVar::notify_sync`
On 12/8/23 08:29, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 9:22 PM Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/6/23 11:09, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>>> Wake up another thread synchronously.
>>>
>>> This method behaves like `notify_one`, except that it hints to the
>>> scheduler that the current thread is about to go to sleep, so it should
>>> schedule the target thread on the same CPU.
>>>
>>> This is used by Rust Binder as a performance optimization. When sending
>>> a transaction to a different process, we usually know which thread will
>>> handle it, so we can schedule that thread for execution next on this
>>> CPU for better cache locality.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>> rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs
>>> index b679b6f6dbeb..9861c6749ad0 100644
>>> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs
>>> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs
>>> @@ -155,6 +155,12 @@ fn notify(&self, count: i32, flags: u32) {
>>> };
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /// Calls the kernel function to notify one thread synchronously.
>>> + pub fn notify_sync(&self) {
>>> + // SAFETY: `wait_list` points to valid memory.
>>> + unsafe { bindings::__wake_up_sync(self.wait_list.get(), bindings::TASK_NORMAL) };
>>
>> I took a look at the C function (i.e. __wake_up_common) and there I
>> found this:
>>
>> lockdep_assert_held(&wq_head->lock);
>>
>> So I think this function requires that the lock is held, how are you
>> ensuring this?
>
> No, we don't need to hold a lock. The call stack is:
>
> 1. __wake_up_sync
> 2. __wake_up_sync_key
> 3. __wake_up_common_lock
> 4. __wake_up_common
>
> And __wake_up_common_lock will lock wq_head->lock before calling
> __wake_up_common.
Seems like I just looked at the wrong function.
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
--
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists