[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231208093515.GN636165@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 11:35:16 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: Return NUMA_NO_NODE instead of -1 to improve
code readability
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 09:10:01PM +0800, Yuntao Wang wrote:
> When no corresponding memory region is found for the given pfn, return
> NUMA_NO_NODE instead of -1. This improves code readability and aligns with
> the existing logic of the memblock_search_pfn_nid() function's user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
Applied, thanks!
> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 5a88d6d24d79..c1f579c23396 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_search_pfn_nid(unsigned long pfn,
> int mid = memblock_search(type, PFN_PHYS(pfn));
>
> if (mid == -1)
> - return -1;
> + return NUMA_NO_NODE;
>
> *start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(type->regions[mid].base);
> *end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(type->regions[mid].base + type->regions[mid].size);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists