linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Be less aggressive in calling cpufreq_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bc525124-da79-45af-a99b-ec4616b3fa6b@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 10:05:38 +0000
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To:     Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>, Rick Yiu <rickyiu@...gle.com>,
        Chung-Kai Mei <chungkai@...gle.com>,
        Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia2@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Be less aggressive in calling
 cpufreq_update_util()

Hi Qais,

On 12/8/23 01:52, Qais Yousef wrote:

[snip]

> @@ -6704,14 +6677,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>   	 */
>   	util_est_enqueue(&rq->cfs, p);
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * If in_iowait is set, the code below may not trigger any cpufreq
> -	 * utilization updates, so do it here explicitly with the IOWAIT flag
> -	 * passed.
> -	 */
> -	if (p->in_iowait)
> -		cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT);
> -

Why this io wait boost is considered as the $subject says 'aggressive'
calling?

Regards,
Lukasz