linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 12/33] function_graph: Use a simple LRU for fgraph

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <170203119964.579004.13369344037111885313.stgit@devnote2>
Date:   Fri,  8 Dec 2023 19:26:40 +0900
From:   "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 12/33] function_graph: Use a simple LRU for fgraph_array index number

From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Since the fgraph_array index is used for the bitmap on the shadow
stack, it may leave some entries after a function_graph instance is
removed. Thus if another instance reuses the fgraph_array index soon
after releasing it, the fgraph may confuse to call the newer callback
for the entries which are pushed by the older instance.
To avoid reusing the fgraph_array index soon after releasing, introduce
a simple LRU table for managing the index number. This will reduce the
possibility of this confusion.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
 Changes in v4:
  - Newly added.
---
 kernel/trace/fgraph.c |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
index 6f537ebd3ed7..d8b139959b62 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
@@ -99,10 +99,44 @@ enum {
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kill_ftrace_graph);
 int ftrace_graph_active;
 
-static int fgraph_array_cnt;
-
 static struct fgraph_ops *fgraph_array[FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE];
 
+/* LRU index table for fgraph_array */
+static int fgraph_lru_table[FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE];
+static int fgraph_lru_next;
+static int fgraph_lru_last;
+
+static void fgraph_lru_init(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
+		fgraph_lru_table[i] = i;
+}
+
+static int fgraph_lru_release_index(int idx)
+{
+	if (idx < 0 || idx >= FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE ||
+	    fgraph_lru_table[fgraph_lru_last] != -1)
+		return -1;
+
+	fgraph_lru_table[fgraph_lru_last] = idx;
+	fgraph_lru_last = (fgraph_lru_last + 1) % FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE;
+	return fgraph_lru_last - 1;
+}
+
+static int fgraph_lru_alloc_index(void)
+{
+	int idx = fgraph_lru_table[fgraph_lru_next];
+
+	if (idx == -1)
+		return -1;
+
+	fgraph_lru_table[fgraph_lru_next] = -1;
+	fgraph_lru_next = (fgraph_lru_next + 1) % FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE;
+	return idx;
+}
+
 static inline int get_ret_stack_index(struct task_struct *t, int offset)
 {
 	return t->ret_stack[offset] & FGRAPH_RET_INDEX_MASK;
@@ -367,7 +401,7 @@ int function_graph_enter(unsigned long ret, unsigned long func,
 	if (index < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < fgraph_array_cnt; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE; i++) {
 		struct fgraph_ops *gops = fgraph_array[i];
 
 		if (gops == &fgraph_stub)
@@ -932,21 +966,17 @@ int register_ftrace_graph(struct fgraph_ops *gops)
 		/* The array must always have real data on it */
 		for (i = 0; i < FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
 			fgraph_array[i] = &fgraph_stub;
+		fgraph_lru_init();
 	}
 
-	/* Look for an available spot */
-	for (i = 0; i < FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE; i++) {
-		if (fgraph_array[i] == &fgraph_stub)
-			break;
-	}
-	if (i >= FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE) {
+	i = fgraph_lru_alloc_index();
+	if (i < 0 ||
+	    WARN_ON_ONCE(fgraph_array[i] != &fgraph_stub)) {
 		ret = -EBUSY;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	fgraph_array[i] = gops;
-	if (i + 1 > fgraph_array_cnt)
-		fgraph_array_cnt = i + 1;
 	gops->idx = i;
 
 	ftrace_graph_active++;
@@ -976,25 +1006,22 @@ int register_ftrace_graph(struct fgraph_ops *gops)
 void unregister_ftrace_graph(struct fgraph_ops *gops)
 {
 	int command = 0;
-	int i;
 
 	mutex_lock(&ftrace_lock);
 
 	if (unlikely(!ftrace_graph_active))
 		goto out;
 
-	if (unlikely(gops->idx < 0 || gops->idx >= fgraph_array_cnt))
+	if (unlikely(gops->idx < 0 || gops->idx >= FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE))
+		goto out;
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(fgraph_array[gops->idx] != gops))
 		goto out;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(fgraph_array[gops->idx] != gops);
+	if (fgraph_lru_release_index(gops->idx) < 0)
+		goto out;
 
 	fgraph_array[gops->idx] = &fgraph_stub;
-	if (gops->idx + 1 == fgraph_array_cnt) {
-		i = gops->idx;
-		while (i >= 0 && fgraph_array[i] == &fgraph_stub)
-			i--;
-		fgraph_array_cnt = i + 1;
-	}
 
 	ftrace_graph_active--;