[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXJdvmZCjRLDV50L@memverge.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 19:05:18 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
jgroves@...ron.com, ravis.opensrc@...ron.com,
sthanneeru@...ron.com, emirakhur@...ron.com, Hasan.Maruf@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, ying.huang@...el.com,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, rakie.kim@...com,
hyeongtak.ji@...com, honggyu.kim@...com, vtavarespetr@...ron.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frank van der Linden <fvdl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/11] mm/mempolicy: add userland mempolicy arg
structure
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:43:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, at 15:58, Gregory Price wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 08:13:22AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, at 01:27, Gregory Price wrote:
> >>
> >> Aside from this, you should avoid holes in the data structure.
> >> On 64-bit architectures, the layout above has holes after
> >> policy_node and after addr_node.
> >>
> >> Arnd
> >
> > doh, clearly i didn't stop to think about alignment. Good eye.
> > I'll redo this with __u/s members and fix the holes.
> >
> > Didn't stop to think about compat pointers. I don't think the
> > u64_to_user_ptr pattern is offensive, so i'll make that change.
> > At least I don't see what the other options are beyond compat.
>
> Ok, sounds good.
>
> I see you already call wrappers for compat mode to convert
> iovec and nodemask layouts for the indirect pointers, and they
> look correct. If you wanted to do handle the compat syscalls
> using the same entry point, you could add the same kind of
> helper to copy the mempolicy args from user space with an
> optional conversion, but not having to do this is clearly
> easier.
>
> Arnd
I don't know that either is easier, it's basically just what annoying
way do you want to handle this annoying problem. I'll poke at it
and decide which one I hate less.
One thing i didn't really think about, probably the iovec/len
fields should just be args for mbind2, rather than embedded in
mpol_args - since mpol_args is supposed to describe the mpol
while the iovec/len describes what it applies to.
Simplifies the mpol_args structure a bit. Doesn't change the handling
at all. (bit of a rubber ducky comment here)
As always, I appreciate the input
~Gregory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists