linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: correct QDU1000 reg entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <170204182670.1155646.3136881067040734815.robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 07:23:59 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: correct QDU1000 reg
 entries


On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:04:36 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Qualcomm QDU1000 DTSI comes with one LLCC0 base address as pointed by
> dtbs_check:
> 
>   qdu1000-idp.dtb: system-cache-controller@...00000: reg-names:2: 'llcc2_base' was expected
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Recent LLCC patches were not tested on QDU1000 thus the LLCC is there
> broken.  This patch at least tries to bring some sense according to
> DTSI, but I have no clue what is here correct: driver, DTS or bindings.
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Applied, thanks!