linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: rename static functions that are called with the lock taken

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZXMi3lga6v4JA8FT@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 16:06:22 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: rename static functions that are called
 with the lock taken

On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 11:20:19AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> 
> Rename two functions that read or modify the global GPIO device list but
> don't take the lock themselves (and need to be called with it already
> acquired). Use the _unlocked() suffix which seems to be used quite
> consistently across the kernel despite there also existing the _locked()
> suffix for the same purpose.

Okay,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko