[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=WHf0t=-OJL0031D+X7cX_D25G7TG0TqROsT34QcEnqsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 15:16:10 +0100
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/33] ftrace: Unpoison ftrace_regs in ftrace_ops_list_func()
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:02 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Architectures use assembly code to initialize ftrace_regs and call
> ftrace_ops_list_func(). Therefore, from the KMSAN's point of view,
> ftrace_regs is poisoned on ftrace_ops_list_func entry(). This causes
> KMSAN warnings when running the ftrace testsuite.
I couldn't reproduce these warnings on x86, hope you really need this
change on s390 :)
> Fix by trusting the architecture-specific assembly code and always
> unpoisoning ftrace_regs in ftrace_ops_list_func.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists