lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEyhmHQOfs39cgKBb0VEdF6=pFodBYYkBichsxX_uBh30kNZXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 9 Dec 2023 14:03:48 +0800
From:   Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@...il.com>
To:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] LoongArch: BPF: Fix sign-extension mov instructions

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 12:12 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:30 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >
> > We can see that "Short form of movsx, dst_reg = (s8,s16,s32)src_reg"
> > in include/linux/filter.h, additionally, for BPF_ALU64 the value of
> > the destination register is unchanged whereas for BPF_ALU the upper
> > 32 bits of the destination register are zeroed, so it should clear
> > the upper 32 bits for BPF_ALU.
> >
> > [root@...ux fedora]# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
> > [root@...ux fedora]# modprobe test_bpf
> >
> > Before:
> > test_bpf: #81 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
> > test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
> >
> > After:
> > test_bpf: #81 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 6 PASS
> > test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 6 PASS
> >
> > By the way, the bpf selftest case "./test_progs -t verifier_movsx" can
> > also be fixed with this patch.
> Hmmm, it is a little strange that privileged verifier_movsx has no problem.
>

I have found the differences between priv and unpriv mode.
The BPF verifier performs different optimizations for priv and upriv progs.
See the following commits:

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/e2ae4ca266a1c
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/52875a04f4b26
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/a1b14abc009d9

As a result, with unprivileged_bpf_disabled on, we have:

  # bpftool p d x i 55
  void mov32sx_s16_range_2():
  ; asm volatile ("                    \
     0: (b7) r1 = 65535
     1: (bc) w2 = w1
     2: (77) r2 >>= 1
     3: (b7) r0 = 1
     4: (95) exit

  # bpftool p d j i 55
  void mov32sx_s16_range_2():
  0xffff800002416238:
  ; asm volatile ("                    \
     0:    addi.d          $a6, $zero, 33(0x21)
     4:    addi.d          $sp, $sp, -64(0xfc0)
     8:    st.d            $ra, $sp, 56(0x38)
     c:    st.d            $fp, $sp, 48(0x30)
    10:    st.d            $s0, $sp, 40(0x28)
    14:    st.d            $s1, $sp, 32(0x20)
    18:    st.d            $s2, $sp, 24(0x18)
    1c:    st.d            $s3, $sp, 16(0x10)
    20:    st.d            $s4, $sp, 8(0x8)
    24:    st.d            $s5, $sp, 0
    28:    addi.d          $fp, $sp, 64(0x40)
    2c:    lu12i.w         $a0, 15(0xf)
    30:    ori             $a0, $a0, 0xfff
    34:    move            $t1, $a0
    38:    ext.w.h         $a1, $t1
    3c:    srli.d          $a1, $a1, 0x1
    40:    addi.w          $a5, $zero, 1(0x1)
    44:    ld.d            $ra, $sp, 56(0x38)
    48:    ld.d            $fp, $sp, 48(0x30)
    4c:    ld.d            $s0, $sp, 40(0x28)
    50:    ld.d            $s1, $sp, 32(0x20)
    54:    ld.d            $s2, $sp, 24(0x18)
    58:    ld.d            $s3, $sp, 16(0x10)
    5c:    ld.d            $s4, $sp, 8(0x8)
    60:    ld.d            $s5, $sp, 0
    64:    addi.d          $sp, $sp, 64(0x40)
    68:    move            $a0, $a5
    6c:    jirl            $zero, $ra, 0

With unprivileged_bpf_disabled off, we have:

  # bpftool p d x i 59
     0: (b7) r1 = 65535
     1: (bc) w2 = w1
     2: (77) r2 >>= 1
     3: (55) if r2 != 0x7fffffff goto pc+2
     4: (b7) r0 = 1
     5: (95) exit
     6: (05) goto pc-1
     7: (05) goto pc-1

  # bpftool p d j i 59
  0xffff8000024146a0:
     0:    addi.d          $a6, $zero, 33(0x21)
     4:    addi.d          $sp, $sp, -64(0xfc0)
     8:    st.d            $ra, $sp, 56(0x38)
     c:    st.d            $fp, $sp, 48(0x30)
    10:    st.d            $s0, $sp, 40(0x28)
    14:    st.d            $s1, $sp, 32(0x20)
    18:    st.d            $s2, $sp, 24(0x18)
    1c:    st.d            $s3, $sp, 16(0x10)
    20:    st.d            $s4, $sp, 8(0x8)
    24:    st.d            $s5, $sp, 0
    28:    addi.d          $fp, $sp, 64(0x40)
    2c:    lu12i.w         $a0, 15(0xf)
    30:    ori             $a0, $a0, 0xfff
    34:    move            $t1, $a0
    38:    ext.w.h         $a1, $t1
    3c:    srli.d          $a1, $a1, 0x1
    40:    lu12i.w         $t1, 524287(0x7ffff)
    44:    ori             $t1, $t1, 0xfff
    48:    move            $t2, $a1
    4c:    beq             $t2, $t1, 8(0x8)    # 0x0000000000000054
    50:    b               12(0xc)    # 0x000000000000005c
    54:    addi.w          $a5, $zero, 1(0x1)
    58:    b               12(0xc)    # 0x0000000000000064
    5c:    b               0    # 0x000000000000005c
    60:    b               0    # 0x0000000000000060
    64:    ld.d            $ra, $sp, 56(0x38)
    68:    ld.d            $fp, $sp, 48(0x30)
    6c:    ld.d            $s0, $sp, 40(0x28)
    70:    ld.d            $s1, $sp, 32(0x20)
    74:    ld.d            $s2, $sp, 24(0x18)
    78:    ld.d            $s3, $sp, 16(0x10)
    7c:    ld.d            $s4, $sp, 8(0x8)
    80:    ld.d            $s5, $sp, 0
    84:    addi.d          $sp, $sp, 64(0x40)
    88:    move            $a0, $a5
    8c:    jirl            $zero, $ra, 0

Without this fix, it seems like the prog is trapped in an infinite loop.

This patch looks good to me, so I am going to offer:

Acked-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@...il.com>

Cheers,
--
Hengqi

> Huacai
>
> >
> > Fixes: f48012f16150 ("LoongArch: BPF: Support sign-extension mov instructions")
> > Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
> > ---
> >  arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
> > index 169ff8b3915e..8c907c2c42f7 100644
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
> > @@ -480,10 +480,12 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
> >                 case 8:
> >                         move_reg(ctx, t1, src);
> >                         emit_insn(ctx, extwb, dst, t1);
> > +                       emit_zext_32(ctx, dst, is32);
> >                         break;
> >                 case 16:
> >                         move_reg(ctx, t1, src);
> >                         emit_insn(ctx, extwh, dst, t1);
> > +                       emit_zext_32(ctx, dst, is32);
> >                         break;
> >                 case 32:
> >                         emit_insn(ctx, addw, dst, src, LOONGARCH_GPR_ZERO);
> > --
> > 2.42.0
> >
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ