[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023120930-possum-ignore-e8df@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2023 10:28:36 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] pcmcia: Convert to platform remove callback
returning void
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 08:19:08PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Am Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 05:08:05PM +0100 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this series changes all platform drivers in drivers/pcmcia to use the
> > .remove_new() callback. See commit 5c5a7680e67b ("platform: Provide a
> > remove callback that returns no value") for an extended explanation and
> > the eventual goal.
> >
> > All conversations are trivial, because all .remove() callbacks returned
> > zero unconditionally already.
> >
> > There are no interdependencies between these patches, so they could be
> > picked up individually. However I'd expect them to go in all together.
> > It's unclrear to me though, who will pick them up. Dominik? Greg?
>
> Both options are fine with me. In the latter case:
>
> Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
I can take these, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists