lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2860437.jE0xQCEvom@diego>
Date:   Sat, 09 Dec 2023 15:04:53 +0100
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Andy Yan <andyshrk@....com>, Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     hjc@...k-chips.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com,
        kever.yang@...k-chips.com, chris.obbard@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/17] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: Add Rockchip RK3588

Hi Andy,

Am Samstag, 9. Dezember 2023, 02:26:25 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> Hi Heiko:
> 
> On 12/9/23 00:29, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2023, 09:02:35 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> >> From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
> >>
> >> Add a Rockchip RK3588 compatible
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> > 
> > In the next iteration, please split this out into a separate patch and send
> > it to the iommu+dt maintainers.
> > 
> > Supporting the iommus on rk3588 can be realized separately and the
> > patch needs to go through a separate tree anyway.
> 
> Okay, I will split this patch out of this vop2 series, does this mean that
> I also need to split out the iommu dt node as a separate patch from current
> PATCH16 ?

no :-) .

The vop-iommu can stay together with the vop core node.
As adding the actual vop iommu is very much tied to the vop node.

For the iommu-compatible it was different. The compatible just declares
that the iommu acts similar to the one on rk3568, so is related to the iommu
driver itself and should go through the iommu tree.

So all is good here.

Heiko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ