linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] tty: serial: amba-pl011: avoid quoted string split across lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 9 Dec 2023 15:43:30 +0100
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Grégory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
        Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
        Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] tty: serial: amba-pl011: avoid quoted string split
 across lines

Le 30/11/2023 à 15:07, Théo Lebrun a écrit :
> Remove all instances of quoted strings split across lines. Fix four
> checkpatch warnings:
> 
>      $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --file \
>          drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
>      WARNING: quoted string split across lines
>      [...]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
> ---
>   drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> index 743dee75c68b..be8888db1a37 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> @@ -973,8 +973,8 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_irq(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
>   	/* Switch buffer & re-trigger DMA job */
>   	dmarx->use_buf_b = !dmarx->use_buf_b;
>   	if (pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(uap)) {
> -		dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not retrigger RX DMA job "
> -			"fall back to interrupt mode\n");
> +		dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
> +			"could not retrigger RX DMA job fall back to interrupt mode\n");
>   		uap->im |= UART011_RXIM;
>   		pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
>   	}
> @@ -1021,8 +1021,8 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_callback(void *data)
>   	 * get some IRQ immediately from RX.
>   	 */
>   	if (ret) {
> -		dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not retrigger RX DMA job "
> -			"fall back to interrupt mode\n");
> +		dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
> +			"could not retrigger RX DMA job fall back to interrupt mode\n");
>   		uap->im |= UART011_RXIM;
>   		pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
>   	}
> @@ -1158,8 +1158,8 @@ static void pl011_dma_startup(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
>   
>   	if (uap->using_rx_dma) {
>   		if (pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(uap))
> -			dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not trigger initial "
> -				"RX DMA job, fall back to interrupt mode\n");
> +			dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
> +				"could not trigger initial RX DMA job, fall back to interrupt mode\n");
>   		if (uap->dmarx.poll_rate) {

Hi,

I think that having a comma just before "fall back", as done here, would 
make the other 3 messages clearer.

CJ

>   			timer_setup(&uap->dmarx.timer, pl011_dma_rx_poll, 0);
>   			mod_timer(&uap->dmarx.timer,
> @@ -1391,8 +1391,8 @@ __acquires(&uap->port.lock)
>   	 */
>   	if (pl011_dma_rx_available(uap)) {
>   		if (pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(uap)) {
> -			dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not trigger RX DMA job "
> -				"fall back to interrupt mode again\n");
> +			dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
> +				"could not trigger RX DMA job fall back to interrupt mode again\n");
>   			uap->im |= UART011_RXIM;
>   			pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
>   		} else {
>