[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2d6853e-2de7-4e12-85f8-c130d9a745a4@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2023 18:42:31 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
quic_cang@...cinc.com, ahalaney@...hat.com,
quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] scsi: ufs: qcom: Code cleanups
On 8.12.2023 07:58, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This series has code some cleanups to the Qcom UFS driver. No functional
> change. In this version, I've removed code supporting legacy controllers
> ver < 2.0, as the respective platforms were never supported in upstream.
>
> Tested on: RB5 development board based on Qcom SM8250 SoC.
>
> - Mani
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> * Collected review tags
> * Fixed the comments from Andrew
> * Added a few more patches, most notably one removing the code for old
> controllers (ver < v2.0)
FWIW i found this snipped from a downstream commit from 2014:
8084 : 1.1.1
8994v1 : 1.2.0
8994v2 : 1.3.0
I'm yet to see any 8994 production device utilizing UFS (it wasn't
very good or affordable in 2014/15 IIRC), so I think it's gtg.
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists