lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202312102220.S53XPqT0-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:39:23 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
Subject: arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-hubio.c:30: warning: Function parameter or
 member 'nasid' not described in 'hub_pio_map'

Hi Thomas,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   c527f5606aa545233a4d2c6d5c636ed82b8633ef
commit: 4bf841ebf17aaa0f7712623896c699b44fa92f44 MIPS: SGI-IP27: get rid of compact node ids
date:   4 years, 2 months ago
config: mips-randconfig-r035-20210927 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231210/202312102220.S53XPqT0-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: mips64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231210/202312102220.S53XPqT0-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312102220.S53XPqT0-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-hubio.c:30: warning: Function parameter or member 'nasid' not described in 'hub_pio_map'
   arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-hubio.c:30: warning: Excess function parameter 'hub' description in 'hub_pio_map'


vim +30 arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-hubio.c

^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  18  
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  19  /**
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  20   * hub_pio_map	-  establish a HUB PIO mapping
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  21   *
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  22   * @hub:	hub to perform PIO mapping on
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  23   * @widget:	widget ID to perform PIO mapping for
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  24   * @xtalk_addr: xtalk_address that needs to be mapped
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  25   * @size:	size of the PIO mapping
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  26   *
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  27   **/
4bf841ebf17aaa Thomas Bogendoerfer 2019-10-03  28  unsigned long hub_pio_map(nasid_t nasid, xwidgetnum_t widget,
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  29  			  unsigned long xtalk_addr, size_t size)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16 @30  {
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  31  	unsigned i;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  32  
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  33  	/* use small-window mapping if possible */
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  34  	if ((xtalk_addr % SWIN_SIZE) + size <= SWIN_SIZE)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  35  		return NODE_SWIN_BASE(nasid, widget) + (xtalk_addr % SWIN_SIZE);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  36  
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  37  	if ((xtalk_addr % BWIN_SIZE) + size > BWIN_SIZE) {
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  38  		printk(KERN_WARNING "PIO mapping at hub %d widget %d addr 0x%lx"
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  39  				" too big (%ld)\n",
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  40  				nasid, widget, xtalk_addr, size);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  41  		return 0;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  42  	}
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  43  
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  44  	xtalk_addr &= ~(BWIN_SIZE-1);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  45  	for (i = 0; i < HUB_NUM_BIG_WINDOW; i++) {
4bf841ebf17aaa Thomas Bogendoerfer 2019-10-03  46  		if (test_and_set_bit(i, hub_data(nasid)->h_bigwin_used))
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  47  			continue;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  48  
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  49  		/*
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  50  		 * The code below does a PIO write to setup an ITTE entry.
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  51  		 *
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  52  		 * We need to prevent other CPUs from seeing our updated
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  53  		 * memory shadow of the ITTE (in the piomap) until the ITTE
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  54  		 * entry is actually set up; otherwise, another CPU might
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  55  		 * attempt a PIO prematurely.
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  56  		 *
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  57  		 * Also, the only way we can know that an entry has been
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  58  		 * received  by the hub and can be used by future PIO reads/
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  59  		 * writes is by reading back the ITTE entry after writing it.
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  60  		 *
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  61  		 * For these two reasons, we PIO read back the ITTE entry
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  62  		 * after we write it.
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  63  		 */
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  64  		IIO_ITTE_PUT(nasid, i, HUB_PIO_MAP_TO_MEM, widget, xtalk_addr);
db0e7d4e42b055 Thomas Bogendoerfer 2019-02-19  65  		__raw_readq(IIO_ITTE_GET(nasid, i));
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  66  
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  67  		return NODE_BWIN_BASE(nasid, widget) + (xtalk_addr % BWIN_SIZE);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  68  	}
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  69  
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  70  	printk(KERN_WARNING "unable to establish PIO mapping for at"
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  71  			" hub %d widget %d addr 0x%lx\n",
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  72  			nasid, widget, xtalk_addr);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  73  	return 0;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  74  }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds      2005-04-16  75  

:::::: The code at line 30 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 Linux-2.6.12-rc2

:::::: TO: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...970.osdl.org>
:::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...970.osdl.org>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ