linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] xhci: Introduce "disable-usb3" DT property/quirk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7984df40-e365-f190-2af5-41073b72403b@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Dec 2023 14:39:14 -0700
From:   Sam Edwards <cfsworks@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xhci: Introduce "disable-usb3" DT property/quirk

On 12/10/23 04:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> It does not really explain why you did not Cc some of the maintainers.
> If this is a RFC, even though not marked as such in subject prefix, then
> I guess all maintainers should be involved for comments.

Hi Krzysztof,

More simply put: I don't want to waste anyone's time by seeking 
review/commentary from linux-devicetree on a property enabling a feature 
that someone here on linux-usb might soon deem (summarily) untenable.

I agree fully that I need (and want) the DT reviewers' sign-off on this 
new property, and I'll get more serious about that (and other things) in 
v2. I just need to know if there's going to be a v2 first.

Warm regards,
Sam