[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB7PR04MB51468DB108F3003AF52CDDDA8C88A@DB7PR04MB5146.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 04:27:16 +0000
From: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC: Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"john.g.garry@...cle.com" <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"mike.leach@...aro.org" <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
"leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: perf: fsl-imx-ddr: Add
i.MX95 compatible
Hi Conor,
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 04:53:59PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote:
> > i.MX95 has a DDR pmu. This will add a compatible for it.
>
> On v1 we had a discussion because the commit message wasn't clear about
> whether or not the device was compatible with existing ones. For some
> reason, the v2 patch _removes_ information from the commit message
> rather than tries to explain.
> This [1] message of yours, that I didn't get a chance to reply to before
> you sent this new version, seems to say that there should be an
> imx93-ddr-pmu fallback.
Thanks for your comments.
Just read my previous comment in [1] and found I made a mistake.
Now I'll try to clarify it here.
Imx95 and imx93 have different AXI filter configuration. I need a
compatible for imx95 since the driver cannot differentiate them.
Then I need to consider below two options:
1. compatible = "fsl,imx95-ddr-pmu", "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu"
2. compatible = "fsl,imx95-ddr-pmu"
Both of them work correctly on imx95. When I make changes in
driver for imx95, imx93 is not affected.
For basic functions, imx95 is compatible with imx93. I select the 2rd
form for simplicity. If the first form is optimal, I can change it in next
version.
Thanks,
Xu Yang
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
> 1 -
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/DB7PR04MB514668A8B172CD1A2187BC408C84A@DB7PR04MB5146.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com/
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - no changes
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/fsl-imx-ddr.yaml | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/fsl-imx-ddr.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/fsl-imx-
> ddr.yaml
> > index e9fad4b3de68..1bc7bf1c8368 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/fsl-imx-ddr.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/fsl-imx-ddr.yaml
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
> > - fsl,imx8mn-ddr-pmu
> > - fsl,imx8mp-ddr-pmu
> > - fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu
> > + - fsl,imx95-ddr-pmu
> > - items:
> > - enum:
> > - fsl,imx8mm-ddr-pmu
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists