linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v1] test_bpf: Rename second ALU64_SMOD_X to ALU64_SMOD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <170218622323.12725.6922514276385110557.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 10 Dec 2023 05:30:23 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        puranjay12@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v1] test_bpf: Rename second ALU64_SMOD_X to
 ALU64_SMOD_K

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>:

On Thu,  7 Dec 2023 12:08:51 +0800 you wrote:
> Currently, there are two test cases with same name
> "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right,
> the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its
> code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K.
> 
> Before:
> test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS
> test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [RESEND,bpf-next,v1] test_bpf: Rename second ALU64_SMOD_X to ALU64_SMOD_K
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5181dc08f795

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html