[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231210060644.26978-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2023 22:06:44 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: six lock: fix typos
Fix a few typos in the six.h header file.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org
---
fs/bcachefs/six.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -- a/fs/bcachefs/six.h b/fs/bcachefs/six.h
--- a/fs/bcachefs/six.h
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/six.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* will have to take write locks for the full duration of the operation.
*
* But by adding an intent state, which is exclusive with other intent locks but
- * not with readers, we can take intent locks at thte start of the operation,
+ * not with readers, we can take intent locks at the start of the operation,
* and then take write locks only for the actual update to each individual
* nodes, without deadlocking.
*
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@
*
* Reentrancy:
*
- * Six locks are not by themselves reentrent, but have counters for both the
- * read and intent states that can be used to provide reentrency by an upper
+ * Six locks are not by themselves reentrant, but have counters for both the
+ * read and intent states that can be used to provide reentrancy by an upper
* layer that tracks held locks. If a lock is known to already be held in the
* read or intent state, six_lock_increment() can be used to bump the "lock
* held in this state" counter, increasing the number of unlock calls that
Powered by blists - more mailing lists