linux-kernel - Re: nolibc changes for 6.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ec6bb811-90b6-4d7f-bdfe-f9b0e183df07@paulmck-laptop>
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:20:18 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, WillyTarreauw@....eu
Subject: Re: nolibc changes for 6.8

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:26:00AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/8/23 17:02, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 06:09:59PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86:
> > > 
> > >    Linux 6.7-rc1 (2023-11-12 16:19:07 -0800)
> > > 
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > 
> > >    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git/ next
> > > 
> > > for you to fetch changes up to b99c3b15310e7c7cd5f2d843289fe115ab3f8043:
> > > 
> > >    selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit (2023-11-26 11:39:52 +0100)
> > 
> > Thank you!
> > 
> > I pulled this in and got the following:
> > 
> > make run:
> > 162 test(s): 162 passed,   0 skipped,   0 failed => status: success
> > 
> > make run-user:
> > 162 test(s): 160 passed,   2 skipped,   0 failed => status: warning
> > 
> > This looks like complete success to me, but please let me know if this
> > is not expected behavior on an x86-64 laptop.
> > 
> 
> Paul,
> 
> This is my turn to send the pull request. Would you like
> me to take care of it?

It is indeed, apologies!!!

Please do take this round.

							Thanx, Paul