linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] selftests/mm: add UFFDIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8a2ce635-58f4-44e1-a646-6527936c5836@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:00:32 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        aarcange@...hat.com, lokeshgidra@...gle.com, peterx@...hat.com,
        ryan.roberts@....com, hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
        axelrasmussen@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org,
        Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, jannh@...gle.com, zhangpeng362@...wei.com,
        bgeffon@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com, ngeoffray@...gle.com,
        jdduke@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] selftests/mm: add UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl test

On 11.12.23 18:32, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 05:53:59PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> 
>>>> (3) avoids dirtying the tree as a "make headers_install" would, but it also
>>>> means that each test that makes use of new uapi has to update the relevant
>>>> headers (what people working on QEMU are used to).
> 
>>> Note that you can do an out of tree build to avoid dirtying things.
> 
>> Yes, but apparently the simple "make headers_install" will dirty the kernel.
> 
>> See (and ideally comment on)
> 
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231209020144.244759-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com
> 
> I mean, I guess people who don't want to install the headers are just
> not going to be able to build a bunch of tests?  There definitely are a
> bunch of tests where it's not needed so I can see why people would not
> like being forced to do the headers step if they're only interested in
> those tests.

Yes. And before that, people mostly had no clue that headers had to be 
installed in order to compile successfully.

So maybe a warning to give at least some hint might be reasonable.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb