linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] leds: trigger: netdev: extend speeds up to 10G

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <657784f6.5d0a0220.617b5.20ee@mx.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:53:55 +0100
From:   Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] leds: trigger: netdev: extend speeds up to 10G

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:46:56AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 16:57:15 +0100 Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > [1/2] leds: trigger: netdev: extend speeds up to 10G
> > >       commit: bc8e1da69a68d9871773b657d18400a7941cbdef
> > > [2/2] docs: ABI: sysfs-class-led-trigger-netdev: add new modes and entry
> > >       commit: f07894d3b384344c43be1bcf61ef8e2fded0efe5
> > >  
> > 
> > Hi, Lee
> > 
> > I'm working on adding LEDs support for qca8081 PHY. This PHY supports
> > 2500 link speed.
> > 
> > Is it possible to have an immutable branch for this series so we can
> > have this in net-next? 
> > 
> > Jakub can you also help with this?
> 
> I'm guessing that if it's already applied - it's already applied.
>

Soo that it's problematic to also have on net-next? (Sorry for the
stupid question)

> Lee, we seem to be getting quite a few LEDs/netdev patches - do you
> reckon we should ask Konstantin for a separate repo to which we can
> both apply, and then merge that into our respective trees? Because
> stacking the changes on stable branches may get weird and/or error
> prone. Or is separate tree an overkill at this stage? IDK..

-- 
	Ansuel