[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231211221059.GJ27535@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:10:59 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@...il.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/19] media: i2c: ov4689: Implement vflip/hflip controls
Hi Mikhail,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:50:14PM +0300, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
> The OV4689 sensor supports horizontal and vertical flipping. Add
> appropriate controls to the driver. Toggling both array flip and
> digital flip bits allows to achieve flipping while maintaining output
> Bayer order. Note that the default value of hflip control corresponds
> to both bits set, as it was before this patch.
What happens if only hlip or vflip is set, does the bayer pattern change
?
Sakari, I think this patch could use your attention.
> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c
> index 67d4004bdcfb..62aeae43d749 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,14 @@
> #define OV4689_HTS_DIVIDER 4
> #define OV4689_HTS_MAX 0x7fff
>
> +#define OV4689_REG_TIMING_FORMAT1 CCI_REG8(0x3820)
> +#define OV4689_REG_TIMING_FORMAT2 CCI_REG8(0x3821)
> +#define OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_MASK GENMASK(2, 1)
> +#define OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_ARRAY BIT(1)
> +#define OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_DIGITAL BIT(2)
> +#define OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_BOTH (OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_ARRAY |\
> + OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_DIGITAL)
> +
> #define OV4689_LANES 4
> #define OV4689_XVCLK_FREQ 24000000
>
> @@ -183,7 +191,6 @@ static const struct cci_reg_sequence ov4689_2688x1520_regs[] = {
> {CCI_REG8(0x3811), 0x08}, /* H_WIN_OFF_L h_win_off[7:0] = 0x08*/
> {CCI_REG8(0x3813), 0x04}, /* V_WIN_OFF_L v_win_off[7:0] = 0x04 */
> {CCI_REG8(0x3819), 0x01}, /* VSYNC_END_L vsync_end_point[7:0] = 0x01 */
> - {CCI_REG8(0x3821), 0x06}, /* TIMING_FORMAT2 array_h_mirror = 1, digital_h_mirror = 1 */
>
> /* OTP control */
> {CCI_REG8(0x3d85), 0x36}, /* OTP_REG85 OTP_power_up_load_setting_enable = 1,
> @@ -605,6 +612,16 @@ static int ov4689_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> (val + ov4689->cur_mode->width) /
> OV4689_HTS_DIVIDER, &ret);
> break;
> + case V4L2_CID_VFLIP:
> + cci_update_bits(regmap, OV4689_REG_TIMING_FORMAT1,
> + OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_MASK,
> + val ? OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_BOTH : 0, &ret);
> + break;
> + case V4L2_CID_HFLIP:
> + cci_update_bits(regmap, OV4689_REG_TIMING_FORMAT2,
> + OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_MASK,
> + val ? 0 : OV4689_TIMING_FLIP_BOTH, &ret);
> + break;
> default:
> dev_warn(dev, "%s Unhandled id:0x%x, val:0x%x\n",
> __func__, ctrl->id, val);
> @@ -633,7 +650,7 @@ static int ov4689_initialize_controls(struct ov4689 *ov4689)
>
> handler = &ov4689->ctrl_handler;
> mode = ov4689->cur_mode;
> - ret = v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(handler, 11);
> + ret = v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(handler, 13);
This should be 12 if my comment on 10/19 is correct. Further patches in
the series may need to be adjusted too.
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -673,6 +690,9 @@ static int ov4689_initialize_controls(struct ov4689 *ov4689)
> ARRAY_SIZE(ov4689_test_pattern_menu) - 1,
> 0, 0, ov4689_test_pattern_menu);
>
> + v4l2_ctrl_new_std(handler, &ov4689_ctrl_ops, V4L2_CID_VFLIP, 0, 1, 1, 0);
> + v4l2_ctrl_new_std(handler, &ov4689_ctrl_ops, V4L2_CID_HFLIP, 0, 1, 1, 0);
> +
> if (handler->error) {
> ret = handler->error;
> dev_err(ov4689->dev, "Failed to init controls(%d)\n", ret);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists