[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <osqmp2j6gsmgbkle6mwhoaf65mjn4a4w3e5hsfbyob6f44wcg6@7rihb5otzl2z>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 23:47:57 +0100
From: Paul Heidekrüger <paul.heidekrueger@....de>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, andrey.konovalov@...ux.dev,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] kasan: switch kunit tests to console tracepoints
On 11.12.2023 21:51, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 7:59 PM Paul Heidekrüger
> <paul.heidekrueger@....de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > I've been successfully running KASAN tests with CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
> > > enabled on arm64 since this patch landed.
> >
> > Interesting ...
> >
> > > What happens when you try running the tests with .kunitconfig? Does
> > > CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS or CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST get disabled during
> > > kernel building?
> >
> > Yes, exactly, that's what's happening.
> >
> > Here's the output kunit.py is giving me. I replaced CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL with
> > CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS in my .kunitconfig. Otherwise, it's identical with the one I
> > posted above.
> >
> > ➜ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=mm/kasan/.kunitconfig --arch=arm64
> > Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
> > Regenerating .config ...
> > Populating config with:
> > $ make ARCH=arm64 O=.kunit olddefconfig
> > ERROR:root:Not all Kconfig options selected in kunitconfig were in the generated .config.
> > This is probably due to unsatisfied dependencies.
> > Missing: CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST=y, CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS=y
> >
> > Does CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS have some dependency I'm not seeing? I couldn't find a
> > reason why it would get disabled, but I could definitely be wrong.
>
> Does your .kunitconfig include CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS=y? I don't see it in
> the listing that you sent earlier.
Yes. For the kunit.py output from my previous email, I replaced
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y with CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS=y. So, the .kunitconfig I used to
produce the output above was:
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=n
CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS=y
CONFIG_KASAN=y
CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC=y
CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST=y
This more or less mirrors what mm/kfence/.kunitconfig is doing, which also isn't
working on my side; kunit.py reports the same error.
Many thanks,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists