[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXbIknpNVxb5Mh2B@gofer.mess.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:30:10 +0000
From: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to
pwm_apply_might_sleep()
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 02:57:42PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:13:34AM +0000, Sean Young wrote:
> > In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context,
> > we will need two functions for applying pwm changes:
> >
> > int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
> > int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
> >
> > This commit just deals with renaming pwm_apply_state(), a following
> > commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function.
> >
> > Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
>
> Not a in-detail-review, but I just noticed again, that we have
>
> K: pwm_(config|apply_state|ops)
>
> in MAINTAINERS. That one needs adaption, too.
Fixed in v7.
Thanks,
Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists