linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] watchdog: starfive-wdt: Add JH8100 watchdog compatible string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84145eba-7877-4dc0-a221-2debb5a40d40@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:06:42 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@...rfivetech.com>,
        Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>,
        Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] watchdog: starfive-wdt: Add JH8100 watchdog
 compatible string

On 09/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible for StarFive's JH8100 watchdog.
> JH8100 watchdog reuses JH7110 register mapping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@...rfivetech.com>
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> index 5f501b41faf9..31785bb373d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops starfive_wdt_pm_ops = {
>  static const struct of_device_id starfive_wdt_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "starfive,jh7100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7100_variant },
>  	{ .compatible = "starfive,jh7110-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
> +	{ .compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },

Device is compatible, so why not expressing it in the bindings and
dropping this change?

Best regards,
Krzysztof