[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=VE7M590AqPceT1qjtf7qS1QGBfvnprz9s=0U2WgRmK6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:13:26 +0100
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 27/33] s390/mm: Define KMSAN metadata for vmalloc and modules
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:07 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The pages for the KMSAN metadata associated with most kernel mappings
> are taken from memblock by the common code. However, vmalloc and module
> metadata needs to be defined by the architectures.
>
> Be a little bit more careful than x86: allocate exactly MODULES_LEN
> for the module shadow and origins, and then take 2/3 of vmalloc for
> the vmalloc shadow and origins. This ensures that users passing small
> vmalloc= values on the command line do not cause module metadata
> collisions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
(hope some s390 maintainer acks this as well)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists