[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=XyTZHU45EhinUSm-+Thux4VPCpT-jyf=cP7hNPcTbK8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:46:22 +0100
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 30/33] s390/uaccess: Add KMSAN support to put_user()
and get_user()
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:03 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> put_user() uses inline assembly with precise constraints, so Clang is
> in principle capable of instrumenting it automatically. Unfortunately,
> one of the constraints contains a dereferenced user pointer, and Clang
> does not currently distinguish user and kernel pointers. Therefore
> KMSAN attempts to access shadow for user pointers, which is not a right
> thing to do.
>
> An obvious fix to add __no_sanitize_memory to __put_user_fn() does not
> work, since it's __always_inline. And __always_inline cannot be removed
> due to the __put_user_bad() trick.
>
> A different obvious fix of using the "a" instead of the "+Q" constraint
> degrades the code quality, which is very important here, since it's a
> hot path.
>
> Instead, repurpose the __put_user_asm() macro to define
> __put_user_{char,short,int,long}_noinstr() functions and mark them with
> __no_sanitize_memory. For the non-KMSAN builds make them
> __always_inline in order to keep the generated code quality. Also
> define __put_user_{char,short,int,long}() functions, which call the
> aforementioned ones and which *are* instrumented, because they call
> KMSAN hooks, which may be implemented as macros.
>
> The same applies to get_user() as well.
>
> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
I think this patch makes sense, but I don't feel myself qualified
enough to stamp it. Hope Heiko's ack is enough.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists