[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfc3d1f8-79fe-494d-a946-0e317d36d51c@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:09:27 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the nvmem tree
On 11/12/2023 10:34, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> sfr@...b.auug.org.au wrote on Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:48:41 +1100:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
>> (but the same patch):
>>
>> 05349b48e254 ("nvmem: Do not expect fixed layouts to grab a layout driver")
>>
>> This is commit
>>
>> b7c1e53751cb ("nvmem: Do not expect fixed layouts to grab a layout driver")
>>
>> in Linus' tree.
>>
>> Also, please keep all the commit message tags together at the end of
>> the commit message.
>>
>
> This is actually fine, Srinivas needs this fix in his tree for
> applying other patches, but he anyway sends a big "series" to GKH at
> -rc6 who finally applies the content of the nvmem-next branch.
Or I can merge or rebase on rc5 which should ensure that there are no
duplicates.
--srini
>
> Thanks for the reports,
> Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists