lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7abaf57-a49a-4a31-a7e6-0d5312367480@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2023 12:50:38 +0100
From:   Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
        alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com, tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com,
        raspl@...ux.ibm.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com,
        guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 7/9] net/smc: support extended GID in SMC-D
 lgr netlink attribute



On 11.12.23 11:09, Wen Gu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/12/11 17:39, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08.12.23 08:40, Wen Gu wrote:
>>> Virtual ISM devices introduced in SMCv2.1 requires a 128 bit extended
>>> GID vs. the existing ISM 64bit GID. So the 2nd 64 bit of extended GID
>>> should be included in SMC-D linkgroup netlink attribute as well.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> This patch did not apply cleanly.
>> Please always base patches on the current net-next
> 
> Strange.. I can apply them cleanly with the latest net-next
> (6e944cc68633 ("Merge branch 'rswitch-jumbo-frames'")).
> 
> Could you please try again? Thanks.
> 

Sorry, the patches were somehow re-ordered when I downloaded them from
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/4ad3a168-f506-fc21-582d-fe8764f404c0@linux.alibaba.com/t.mbox.gz

Everything is ok with this patch.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ